Reading Roundup and a Confession
Life hasn’t been only space TV shows, work, parenting and Listen to Your Mother over the last few months. I managed to read a few books, but I never had a chance to write a thorough review for them. At this point, a thorough review seems like a lost cause, so I thought I would combine my thoughts about them into this post. Maybe one will make it onto your “to read” list.
I Read Books!
A 14-year-old boy is found stabbed to death in the woods near his school, and Assistant District Attorney Barber is shocked to discover his son is the prime suspect in the case. Jacob insists that he is innocent, and ADA Barber shifts into defense mode to save his son as the world he thought he knew falls apart around him and he is forced to confront unpleasant truths about his past as well as whether he really knows his son. Most of the book is a courtroom drama, but there is a shocking plot twist at the end.
This book was a very fast read and very engrossing. That said, I didn’t think it was a very good book, but it earned raves from many prominent reviewers. The father’s a jerk. The mother is a cipher, and Jacob is never fully present in the book. He is portrayed through recollections and stories. One of Landay’s goals is to make you question whether Jacob is an sullen, emo teenager or a psychopath as well as whether there is such a thing as a genetic disposition towards violence. The problem is that you never get to see the world through Jacob’s eyes but through only his mother’s and father’s, and they are not what I would consider to be reliable narrators.
Landay employs a very surprising plot twist at the end that I didn’t see coming – it truly shocked me – but I felt like he spent so much time setting up the twist that it impacted his characterization. Maybe that’s why Jacob never seemed like a main player in a book that is ostensibly about him and his supposed crime.
Coincidentally, I read the book a few days after the Newtown shooting and maybe it was too soon. Maybe the frustration I felt over the lack of character development mirrored the frustration we felt at being unable to ask Lanza WHY. We’re left to extrapolate meaning from memory and conversation relayed by others when what we really wish we could do is talk one-on-one.
Maybe it’s a good thing I haven’t had a chance to write a review for this book because I’m not sure how I could do it justice. Andrew Solomon spent a decade meticulously researching and investigating ways in which children can be profoundly different from their parents and what that does to our notion of family, identity and the world. He begins with his own experience as the homosexual child of heterosexual parents and goes onto explore deafness, autism, disability, dwarfism, genius, schizophrenia, Down Syndrome, children of rape, criminals and transgender.
I cannot say enough positive things about this book. Solomon does a masterful job of helping you enter the worlds he describes and handles each identity thoughtfully and with great respect. I learned so much, and I also had so many ideas challenged. Each identity is its own chapter and that made it easy to jump around or take a long time to read the book (as I did). I highly recommend this book if you are looking for a big book to chew on.
So Sheryl Sandberg wrote a book. Maybe you’ve heard of it? I eagerly read this book, curious to see what had generated so much debate and whether I, as a working mother, would agree or disagree with Sandberg’s advice. Overall, “underwhelmed” describes my reaction to the book. A lot of what she advises is common sense: marry a man who will be a real partner; even if you plan to take time out of the workforce when you have children, don’t use that as an excuse t0 check out too early; take a seat at the table; don’t let fear hold you back.
I don’t mean to imply that it is a bad book; it isn’t. Sandberg offers a lot of useful advice about finding a mentor (if you have to ask someone, then they aren’t a mentor) and how to assert yourself (focus on what problem can you solve for someone). I liked that Sandberg talked about the conflict, guilt and a judgment she feels from time to time. Sandberg has achieved a lot and knows what she is talking about, but I expected more. Sandberg’s advice is for the individual woman in the workforce and what she can do to succeed, but there is no talk about how corporate America and our work infrastructure must change in order to make it easier for women to succeed and have families. She comes closest when she notes:
“For decades, we have focused on giving women the choice to work inside or outside the home. . . . But we have to ask ourselves if we have become so focused on supporting personal choices that we’re failing to encourage women to aspire to leadership.”
There is a lot of truth in that statement, but what is left unsaid is that encouraging women to aspire to leadership is not enough. Aspiration won’t be sufficient to break through the real barriers that exist; what can business do to support women better?
Summer Reading List
We’re going to the beach in about 6 weeks (yay!), and I have been adding books to my list in the (likely) deluded hope I get to read any of them. Here are a few that have caught my eye:
- The Interestings
- Sisterland (I’m not a huge Sittenfeld fan, so we’ll see if I like this one any better)
- Lexicon
- The Yonahlossee Riding Camp for Girls
- The Shining Girls
- The 5th Wave
- Poppet
- Life After Life
Don’t worry. I’ll also go through my book sale treasures for the conspiracy theory books that are my guilty pleasure
Confession
I’ve stated that I will read almost anything, and I mean that! If a book sounds fun or interesting, I’ll give it a shot, no matter how pulpy. To prove this to you, I’ll share what I consider to be my most embarrassing read:
The Left Behind Series.
Yes, I read every book in the series. All 16. I checked out those suckers 3 and 4 at a time from the library. I was hooked. I was intrigued at how the authors would tackle the Rapture and the events in Revelations.
And they truly weren’t the worst books I’ve ever read. Sensational? Yes. Over the top? Yes. Dogmatic? Yes. But this all-but-professed atheist found them riveting. Maybe they play into my conspiracy theory-loving soul. Maybe I was bored. I don’t know, but I read the entire series, and I don’t regret it.
What is the best book you read recently?
What is on your summer reading list?
What’s your most embarrassing read?
A Rant on Reproductive “Rights” and Horrible Daycares
I’ve read a few stories the past few days that are horrific. They make me sick to my stomach and want to cry. They also force me to conclude that there is not only a war against women (not that I was a doubter) but also that there is true disdain for being a poor woman.
I wonder if the right, the so-called conservatives or family-values brigade, realizes how contradictory its positions are. Don’t have sex until marriage (the 1900s called and they want their values back), but if you do and get pregnant, you better keep it. If you are pregnant, that 8-celled embryo has more rights than you, but don’t expect us to help if the child you dutifully birth needs Head Start to prepare for school. If you expect to get government assistance (AKA welfare) to subsist, you have to work; where and in what conditions you put those kids we begged you to have isn’t our concern.
Sure, I’m likely generalizing quite a bit and being a bit inflammatory, but honestly, I’m shocked and appalled at what is going on in this country lately when it comes to reproductive rights and then the lack of policies to help care for children from the self-named “family values party.”
Look, people are going to have sex. They’ve had sex for hundreds of millions of years, and your declaration that sex outside of marriage (a fairly recent invention) is immoral isn’t making a difference. Women want to have sex responsibly and be in charge of their own reproductive outcomes and seek contraception, yet there is a war on that. Women get pregnant (because they didn’t have access to contraception) and decide to seek a legal (remember that fact?) abortion. Unfortunately, for lower income women, it may be difficult to obtain one in the legally-allowed time frame due to cost. As a result, they may have to seek one at type like Gosnell’s. Do you think a woman wants to have a partial-birth abortion? Do you really think a woman wakes up one day and says, “you know, I’m tired of this whole pregnancy thing. Think I’ll get a partial-birth abortion.” The woman who settles on a place like this clinic is desperate and poor. She can’t afford earlier procedures or better conditions and puts her life in the hands of this so-called doctor. It’s NOT a whim.
Let’s say the woman decides to have the baby and parent it. That’s wonderful, right? Except for the fact that she will need to work to support her family and/or obtain any government assistance. She has to do something with the child, right? Decent, regulated child care can be difficult to obtain at best and unaffordable at worst. Do you think this mother wants to leave her beloved child in a situation that might cause unease? That might seem unsafe? Daycare is expensive. Good daycare is VERY expensive. How can you demand a mother work to receive any assistance, yet make it impossible for her to find decent care for her child? And then when tragedy happens, you cluck that this is what happens when mothers enter the workforce, conveniently ignoring the fact that you have contributed to this Scylla and Charybdis.
You might be wondering what dog I have in this fight. I admit that I am privileged. I own it. Jimmy and I are fortunate to be able to afford the best daycare for our son and any other services he might need. We have the ability to shop around and evaluate excellent facilities according to our whims. I’ve never worried how we were going to support our family. Never worried about the toll an extra mouth to feed might take. Never had to fight for any type of contraception (and I write that with great irony given my particular conditions). Hell, we were able to pay a lot of money to have a baby. Conservatives, we are your people! Except for the fact that I loathe injustice. I loathe children not being able to get a fair shake in life. I loathe children being placed in unsafe conditions due to a lack of government intervention. I loathe women being treated as lower-class citizens. I loathe feeling like my gender is denied intelligence in some political circles. And I also loathe being told what to do with my own body. And overall, I loathe unfairness.
I wonder what it says about a country that values upholding the right of its citizens to own guns–even guns that could almost be weapons of mass destruction–over valuing and caring for its youngest citizens. As Cohn’s article points out, government subsidy of childcare could have huge returns as far as reduced prison, health and special education costs and increased economic contributions. To me, it seems a no-brainer. What am I missing?
After Newtown, I lost a friend on Twitter after I tweeted that the Republicans cared more about embryos and potential than actual children since they were reluctant to enact gun control measures. I understand she was offended, but I stand by that sentiment, and nothing I have read has altered my stance.
The explanation often given is to let the free market decide. Capitalism will decide. I don’t think so. When I was in high school and learning about different types of economic systems, my teacher pointed out that capitalism without restraints can be very harsh. Capitalism is the “honey badger” of economic systems. Unsafe conditions or too-low wages? Capitalism don’t care. Read The Jungle and then tell me government intervention is unnecessary. The programs FDR put in place and similar social programs were necessary to blunt the sharpness of Capitalism. Yet too many politicians seek to dismantle them. Why care for the elderly? Why allow our citizens to feel like their country rewards them for any service? Hell, just let us die and then bulldoze over us to build the next monstrosity to profit (for a few!) Capitalism demands.
I’m mad. I’m angry. I’m furious that anyone, let alone any woman, any mother, regardless of financial status has to justify any decision she makes. Has to jump through hoops to make pertinent decisions for herself, her body and her children or future children. Has to believe she has no other option than to go to a cut-rate abortion provider who doesn’t even clean up after prior procedures. Has to put her precious child in a situation that feels not quite right in order to earn money.
We live in the richest, most free country in the world, yet we’re content to let religion and dogma prevent us from doing what is ethical and what is right. Am I wrong to be bothered by that?
The World According to Daniel
The (Unintentionally) Inappropriate
Daniel, to himself, as he puts on his pants: That’s not the right hole.
Me: That’s a life lesson.
***
Daniel, at story time: Mommy, I want to get in you
(He means he wants my arms around him, but my eyebrows raise & I snicker like a 13-year-old boy every time he says it)
The Sassy
Daniel, after dropping a starfish in the car: Mommy, get that for me.
Me: I can’t; I’m driving.
Daniel: Oh, I think you can.
Me: !!!!
***
Me: Can you share your water with Elly (the starfish)?
Daniel: No. I will not share with Elly.
Me: Would you share your water with me?
Daniel: No. I will share with myself. I’m not sharing with anyone.
***
Me, during tuck time: Can I have one more hug and kiss?
Daniel, rolling over: I’ve already given you one.
The Sweet
Daniel: Elly and Henry (two of his starfish) are best friends.
Me: Who is your best friend, Daniel?
Daniel: You are, mommy. You’re my best friend.
Me: unable to respond because I’m a puddle on the floor.







